Hierarchical Bayesian myocardial perfusion quantification

6 Jun 2019  ·  Cian M. Scannell, Amedeo Chiribiri, Adriana D. M. Villa, Marcel Breeuwer, Jack Lee ·

Purpose: Tracer-kinetic models can be used for the quantitative assessment of contrast-enhanced MRI data. However, the model-fitting can produce unreliable results due to the limited data acquired and the high noise levels. Such problems are especially prevalent in myocardial perfusion MRI leading to the compromise of constrained numerical deconvolutions and segmental signal averaging being commonly used as alternatives to the more complex tracer-kinetic models. Methods: In this work, the use of hierarchical Bayesian inference for the parameter estimation is explored. It is shown that with Bayesian inference it is possible to reliably fit the two-compartment exchange model to perfusion data. The use of prior knowledge on the ranges of kinetic parameters and the fact that neighbouring voxels are likely to have similar kinetic properties combined with a Markov chain Monte Carlo based fitting procedure significantly improves the reliability of the perfusion estimates with compared to the traditional least-squares approach. The method is assessed using both simulated and patient data. Results: The average (standard deviation) normalised mean square error for the distinct noise realisations of a simulation phantom falls from 0.32 (0.55) with the least-squares fitting to 0.13 (0.2) using Bayesian inference. The assessment of the presence of coronary artery disease based purely on the quantitative MBF maps obtained using Bayesian inference matches the visual assessment in all 24 slices. When using the maps obtained by the least-squares fitting, a corresponding assessment is only achieved in 16/24 slices. Conclusion: Bayesian inference allows a reliable, fully automated and user-independent assessment of myocardial perfusion on a voxel-wise level using the two-compartment exchange model.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here