Identification of 4FGL uncertain sources at Higher Resolutions with Inverse Discrete Wavelet Transform

5 Jan 2024  ·  Haitao Cao, Hubing Xiao, Zhijian Luo, Xiangtao Zeng, Junhui Fan ·

In the forthcoming era of big astronomical data, it is a burden to find out target sources from ground-based and space-based telescopes. Although Machine Learning (ML) methods have been extensively utilized to address this issue, the incorporation of in-depth data analysis can significantly enhance the efficiency of identifying target sources when dealing with massive volumes of astronomical data. In this work, we focused on the task of finding AGN candidates and identifying BL Lac/FSRQ candidates from the 4FGL DR3 uncertain sources. We studied the correlations among the attributes of the 4FGL DR3 catalogue and proposed a novel method, named FDIDWT, to transform the original data. The transformed dataset is characterized as low-dimensional and feature-highlighted, with the estimation of correlation features by Fractal Dimension (FD) theory and the multi-resolution analysis by Inverse Discrete Wavelet Transform (IDWT). Combining the FDIDWT method with an improved lightweight MatchboxConv1D model, we accomplished two missions: (1) to distinguish the Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) from others (Non-AGNs) in the 4FGL DR3 uncertain sources with an accuracy of 96.65%, namely, Mission A; (2) to classify blazar candidates of uncertain type (BCUs) into BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) or Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs) with an accuracy of 92.03%, namely, Mission B. There are 1354 AGN candidates in Mission A, 482 BL Lacs candidates and 128 FSRQ candidates in Mission B were found. The results show a high consistency of greater than 98% with the results in previous works. In addition, our method has the advantage of finding less variable and relatively faint sources than ordinary methods.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here