Minimizing bias in massive multi-arm observational studies with BCAUS: balancing covariates automatically using supervision
Observational studies are increasingly being used to provide supplementary evidence in addition to Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) because they provide a scale and diversity of participants and outcomes that would be infeasible in an RCT. Additionally, they more closely reflect the settings in which the studied interventions will be applied in the future. Well-established propensity-score-based methods exist to overcome the challenges of working with observational data to estimate causal effects. These methods also provide quality assurance diagnostics to evaluate the degree to which bias has been removed and the estimates can be trusted. In large medical datasets it is common to find the same underlying health condition being treated with a variety of distinct drugs or drug combinations. Conventional methods require a manual iterative workflow, making them scale poorly to studies with many intervention arms. In such situations, automated causal inference methods that are compatible with traditional propensity-score-based workflows are highly desirable.
PDF AbstractTasks
Datasets
Task | Dataset | Model | Metric Name | Metric Value | Global Rank | Benchmark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Causal Inference | IHDP | BCAUS DR | Average Treatment Effect Error | 0.29 | # 6 |