Search Results for author: Moon Kim

Found 7 papers, 4 papers with code

Real-World Federated Learning in Radiology: Hurdles to overcome and Benefits to gain

no code implementations15 May 2024 Markus R. Bujotzek, Ünal Akünal, Stefan Denner, Peter Neher, Maximilian Zenk, Eric Frodl, Astha Jaiswal, Moon Kim, Nicolai R. Krekiehn, Manuel Nickel, Richard Ruppel, Marcus Both, Felix Döllinger, Marcel Opitz, Thorsten Persigehl, Jens Kleesiek, Tobias Penzkofer, Klaus Maier-Hein, Rickmer Braren, Andreas Bucher

Our results underscore the value of efforts needed to translate FL into real-world applications by demonstrating advantageous performance over alternatives, and emphasize the importance of strategic organization, robust management of distributed data and infrastructure in real-world settings.

Rethinking Annotator Simulation: Realistic Evaluation of Whole-Body PET Lesion Interactive Segmentation Methods

no code implementations2 Apr 2024 Zdravko Marinov, Moon Kim, Jens Kleesiek, Rainer Stiefelhagen

In an initial user study involving four annotators, we assess existing robot users using our proposed metrics and find that robot users significantly deviate in performance and annotation behavior compared to real annotators.

Interactive Segmentation Segmentation

Multilingual Natural Language Processing Model for Radiology Reports -- The Summary is all you need!

no code implementations29 Sep 2023 Mariana Lindo, Ana Sofia Santos, André Ferreira, Jianning Li, Gijs Luijten, Gustavo Correia, Moon Kim, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Cornelius Deuschl, Johannes Haubold, Jens Kleesiek, Jan Egger, Victor Alves

In this study, the generation of radiology impressions in different languages was automated by fine-tuning a model, publicly available, based on a multilingual text-to-text Transformer to summarize findings available in English, Portuguese, and German radiology reports.

Accurate Fine-Grained Segmentation of Human Anatomy in Radiographs via Volumetric Pseudo-Labeling

1 code implementation6 Jun 2023 Constantin Seibold, Alexander Jaus, Matthias A. Fink, Moon Kim, Simon Reiß, Ken Herrmann, Jens Kleesiek, Rainer Stiefelhagen

Results: Our resulting segmentation models demonstrated remarkable performance on CXR, with a high average model-annotator agreement between two radiologists with mIoU scores of 0. 93 and 0. 85 for frontal and lateral anatomy, while inter-annotator agreement remained at 0. 95 and 0. 83 mIoU.

Anatomy Computed Tomography (CT) +2

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.