no code implementations • 26 Sep 2023 • Andreas Haghofer, Eda Parlak, Alexander Bartel, Taryn A. Donovan, Charles-Antoine Assenmacher, Pompei Bolfa, Michael J. Dark, Andrea Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Andrea Klang, Kathrin Jäger, Robert Klopfleisch, Sophie Merz, Barbara Richter, F. Yvonne Schulman, Hannah Janout, Jonathan Ganz, Josef Scharinger, Marc Aubreville, Stephan M. Winkler, Matti Kiupel, Christof A. Bertram
We assessed the following nuclear evaluation methods for measurement accuracy, reproducibility, and prognostic utility: 1) anisokaryosis (karyomegaly) estimates by 11 pathologists; 2) gold standard manual morphometry of at least 100 nuclei; 3) practicable manual morphometry with stratified sampling of 12 nuclei by 9 pathologists; and 4) automated morphometry using a deep learning-based segmentation algorithm.
no code implementations • 28 Sep 2021 • Gabriel Kronberger, Lukas Kammerer, Bogdan Burlacu, Stephan M. Winkler, Michael Kommenda, Michael Affenzeller
In this chapter we take a closer look at the distribution of symbolic regression models generated by genetic programming in the search space.
no code implementations • 28 Sep 2021 • Lukas Kammerer, Gabriel Kronberger, Bogdan Burlacu, Stephan M. Winkler, Michael Kommenda, Michael Affenzeller
Symbolic regression is a powerful system identification technique in industrial scenarios where no prior knowledge on model structure is available.